seemingly Rachel now wants to do a naked magazine photo shoot. Suppose she may aswell cash in.

 

So anyone know what the ex housemates have been up to since BB? Any record deals/ Hello mag interviews/TV appearances?

:o :blink:

 

She said she'd do it for charity

And that makes it all completely fine? :lol:

 

Her mum will be proud...

 

And this should be unstickied, but not locked.

Edited September 9, 200816 yr by Harve

That's completely unpredictable. PSYCH.

Obviously Rachel's going to be plastered around as the little slag she really is;

Doubt she's bothered now her c**p act has fooled the actual retarded public has given her £100, 000 for f*** all -rolls eyes-.

 

 

Anyway where has Rex admitted he's cheated? I WANT TO KNOW.

And that makes it all completely fine? :lol:

 

Well it's not cashing in if it's for charity is it :blink:

That's completely unpredictable. PSYCH.

Obviously Rachel's going to be plastered around as the little slag she really is;

Doubt she's bothered now her c**p act has fooled the actual retarded public has given her £100, 000 for f*** all -rolls eyes-.

Anyway where has Rex admitted he's cheated? I WANT TO KNOW.

I've seen it's advertised in OK! Magazine.

Well looks like Rachel is going to be herself now she has won the money. I knew there was something not right about her. :nono:

Rex & Nicole are all over the OK Magazine this week :puke2: how foul

 

Mario & Lisa also have their own shoot & interview in there :lol:

 

Rachel has been herself the whole time :rolleyes:

Rachel has been herself the whole time :rolleyes:

Yeaaaah, keep telling yourself that lol.

I'LL EXPECT TO BE SEEING HER ON THE COVER OF FHM IN A FEW WEEKS. Not that she's good enough because she's a WHALE.

 

No offence yeah but that child is fakefakefake.

How EMBARRASSING for those tard that actually voted her to win. Gutted.

She's fake because she's doing a naked photoshoot for CHARITY?!

 

Good lord. Any excuse for people to go straight for her. BeautifulAngel I think you're just a very jealous woman.

 

As for you Chemmie, REXOBSESSED isn't the world. IT JUST ISN'T.

Nah, i think Rachel was being herself throught it all really. Anyway its for charity so stop making it out to be something it isnt.

Yeaaaah, keep telling yourself that lol.

I'LL EXPECT TO BE SEEING HER ON THE COVER OF FHM IN A FEW WEEKS. Not that she's good enough because she's a WHALE.

 

No offence yeah but that child is fakefakefake.

How EMBARRASSING for those tard that actually voted her to win. Gutted.

 

Riiiiiight.

She's fake because she's doing a naked photoshoot for CHARITY?!

 

Good lord. Any excuse for people to go straight for her. BeautifulAngel I think you're just a very jealous woman.

 

As for you Chemmie, REXOBSESSED isn't the world. IT JUST ISN'T.

 

No because she's an arsehole rly lol.

Like someone said ASIF doing it for charity means it's good; what a load of old fecking $h!te!

She's CLEAAAARLY as clear as ACTUALLLL real life crystals she's just using that so no one sees her for the skank whore she is.

 

I bet anyone else who'd have done it and said it was for charity everyone would be all "BULL". But obvs

it's much more believable that a "DISNEY WISNEY STAR OOOH!" suggests it. Rachel is a fat whale.

 

 

 

 

[PS I CAN'T HELP IT JAKE; I CAN SEE HIM MARRYING ME AND FATHERING MY GINGER KIDDLYWINKS :( SOS!!!]

And stop saying mean things about Leslie just because SHE SEES THROUGH HER TOO :o.

All of the rest of you are clearly just living a blinkered secondrate Mikey lifestyle. THE SHAME.

She hasn't actually posed nude though LOL.

 

So until she does... whats she done wrong?

Because she's just ANNOYING :(((.

And when I read/hear her name it makes me vom in my mouth a bit lol.

 

Honestly though if I ever saw her in real life I rly would just puunch her in the chops.

She's too punchable looking.

No because she's an arsehole rly lol.

Like someone said ASIF doing it for charity means it's good; what a load of old fecking $h!te!

She's CLEAAAARLY as clear as ACTUALLLL real life crystals she's just using that so no one sees her for the skank whore she is.

 

I bet anyone else who'd have done it and said it was for charity everyone would be all "BULL". But obvs

it's much more believable that a "DISNEY WISNEY STAR OOOH!" suggests it. Rachel is a fat whale.

[PS I CAN'T HELP IT JAKE; I CAN SEE HIM MARRYING ME AND FATHERING MY GINGER KIDDLYWINKS :( SOS!!!]

This doesn't make any sense. What are you suggesting she gains from a photoshoot for charity? What, so the oldie calendergirls who did the nude shots for a Cancer charity were just doing it for ego? Or the Cosmo men calender for cancer is just done out of egotistical selfish self-gain? No, of course not. Anyone else who does something like this for charity is applauded by most not hit with cynical, quasi-hateful glare?

 

How in the world is she remotely like a 'skank'? When has she ever projected any 'skankiness'? S:

 

Fair enough if you dislike someone but don't find any excuse to dislike her [especially when she's doing something nice like too].

 

Leslie can just hush. The woman who bumraped Stuart of all people [who more than highlighted his nasty ways on spit-gate night and generally was a dick afterward] and has the gaul to berate Rachel. Double-standards I think yes.

No because she's an arsehole rly lol.

Like someone said ASIF doing it for charity means it's good; what a load of old fecking $h!te!

She's CLEAAAARLY as clear as ACTUALLLL real life crystals she's just using that so no one sees her for the skank whore she is.

 

I bet anyone else who'd have done it and said it was for charity everyone would be all "BULL". But obvs

it's much more believable that a "DISNEY WISNEY STAR OOOH!" suggests it. Rachel is a fat whale.

[PS I CAN'T HELP IT JAKE; I CAN SEE HIM MARRYING ME AND FATHERING MY GINGER KIDDLYWINKS :( SOS!!!]

 

Now, I'm disappointed Rachel won aswell (Queen Lisaaaaaaa.... :( ) But seriously, Rachel a fat whale? She's a bloody pencil!

And to be fair, Rachel must be the ONLY BB female in history NOT to have dropped her knickers for a magazine as of yet. Give her some credit. Look at that ghastly Steph for example. In the house for all of 7 days, and still she's Jodie Marsh's slutty sister. On the front page of the Star in her underwear AGAIN today, apparantly Rex has already cheated with her on Nicole. NICE.

Edited September 10, 200816 yr by Shoat

This doesn't make any sense. What are you suggesting she gains from a photoshoot for charity? What, so the oldie calendergirls who did the nude shots for a Cancer charity were just doing it for ego? Or the Cosmo men calender for cancer is just done out of egotistical selfish self-gain? No, of course not. Anyone else who does something like this for charity is applauded by most not hit with cynical, quasi-hateful glare?

 

How in the world is she remotely like a 'skank'? When has she ever projected any 'skankiness'? S:

 

Fair enough if you dislike someone but don't find any excuse to dislike her [especially when she's doing something nice like too].

 

Leslie can just hush. The woman who bumraped Stuart of all people [who more than highlighted his nasty ways on spit-gate night and generally was a dick afterward] and has the gaul to berate Rachel. Double-standards I think yes.

 

I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOUR LANGUAGE JAKE. I've told you this you need to water your big words down lol :(((. I've never heard of these Old women calnders :/ [butew]. So she couldn't have done something else for charity in her own time? But no, it's fine now she's got """celeb"""" status; what a pile of p***.

 

Because everyone's too stupid to understand obviously. HOW IS SHE NOT A FAKE SKANK?

Like I've said forever Kat with her cookie generally happy saga gets slated like nobody's business;

yet Rachel conveniantly acts like a f***ing t*** with her "OMGOSH MR MOFF AND SPIDEY" and "DISNEYWISNEY AND GWAPES!" yet...kay that's fine yeah.

 

Buuuuuutttt...WHATEVER basically. If men were girls you'd understand GIRL WORLD. Seriously Rachel is to life what Regina George...not Regina George actually, more just the backup ones that clang onto her arse like Gretchen, was to Mean Girls.

 

 

 

 

And Steph's fit so that's automatically different. AND at least everyone already knew Steph was a grotesque skank and she showed it whereas Rachel's gone along the whole show with the sweet and innocent act. And she is tiny from the top half but her arse is like the f***ing elephant man.

LOL, she's hardly a whale is she. She's just normal in terms of weight.

Yh okay -VOM-.

 

Well anyway yeah; it all boils down to have a sex change, watch Mean Girls, and live a girl's life.

Then you'll get it.

 

I'll stop writing here now (mebbes) so you can all stop having your little epi fits -rolls eyes.

I think she actually said something like she'd only pose nude if none of her 'bits' are in the picture and it's done tasefully in black and white. I don't see anything wrong with that, especially if it is for charity. If anything doing it for charity is living up to her ultra nice persona.

 

I don't actually think she's fake at all just uber boring.