Jump to content

Liam Sota

Members
  • Joined

  1. Sabrina should hopefully bring some order to the charts
  2. If they let him leave to a prem team yeah Amorim will need to win the prem to be forgiven
  3. Liverpool have a 16 yr old scoring a winning goal Arsenal haven’t spent any a 15 yr old having good minutes Man Utd’s wonder kid who played well at the euros can’t get a minute over Ugarte or Casemiro and now wants to leave. Not great.
  4. They’re saying Chelsea offered £35 mill for Garnacho but Man Utd are holding out for £50mill which is quite a way off. So a lot of these sagas will go on right till they end of the window it seems
  5. Only two games but Wirtz is not looking like a £100mill player. Doesn’t have the legs for the prem
  6. I just don’t think it’s a subject that can really be fruitful for the way you view issues. I’m a reality over narrative person. You can’t browbeat or guilt trip me into anything you need to show it’s factually wrong or logically wrong or doesn’t make sense. I can’t really think of many other examples but if I remember the Huw Edwards case it was a very classic case of an obvious groomer and almost certain pdf and I think your take was to get stuck on the homophobia narrative which led to bad judgement on the individual and who he actually was. You simply cannot make mistakes when it comes to the safety of kids for narrative reasons. We literally had or still have one of the biggest scandals in British history due to exactly that happening. This boat stuff is 1/3rd of all asylum seekers most apply properly and are somewhat vetted. Unvetted is unacceptable as too dangerous since we don’t know who they are. Your position is it’s prejudicial to judge unvetted people before they do anything and it’s just dangerous and out of touch for me.
  7. They were just giving fans a choice over what variant they liked not issuing countdowns and limited quantity with diff covers to entice the same people to buy the same album 10+ times to boost the sales
  8. Eminem released a new(mostly old tracks) soundtrack I heard the new song on TikTok can’t see it doing big numbers but might feature in the next few days
  9. 54% say justified 34% say unjustified
  10. aturday 30th August Chelsea 2-1 Fulham (12:30) Manchester United 3-1 Burnley Sunderland 2-1 Brentford Tottenham Hotspur 2-1 AFC Bournemouth Wolverhampton Wanderers 1-2 Everton Leeds United 1-1 Newcastle United (17:30) Sunday 31st August Brighton & Hove Albion 1-2 Manchester City (14:00) Nottingham Forest 2-1 West Ham United (14:00) Liverpool 1-1 Arsenal (16:30) Aston Villa 1-1Crystal Palace (19:00)
  11. Maybe I don’t read my posts back to see how it appears but I’m quite laid back just opinionated I don’t actually have any anger ever really in posts but the odd thing is irksome. People who are too deep in bubbles really have to understand that talking to people with subtle accusations and loaded statements isn’t being friendly. It’s quite insulting. And you’ve done this multiple times btw. You’ll say the most vicious hateful things then act like an empath. I remember when I showed the journalist who spoke to them people in that town where they went from Labour to reform and your comments were pretty unkind to say the least. I’m not swayed by emotional blackmail not least when the overall sentiment is to justify abhorrently dangerous positions while essentially calling victims of these positions benefit scrounging knuckle heads. I was discussing the actual issue you made it emotive and personal and you seem annoyed I’m not manipulated by it. I get it’s very hive mind here and people come from a narrative where they’re used to having complete double standards where they can be wildly hateful towards certain people then be nose-deep in victimhood while somehow thinking that’s empathetic and kind but I’ve seen a lot of pretty ugly things and I know the actual consequences and the actual effects of certain crimes. It’s definitely been minimised by some here for sure. You say I said you’re making things up(made that up) While saying I’ve decided to judge people because they’re brown(completely wild accusation) And this is the only way for me you can be comfortable discussing such an issue. To emotively place opposition views as motivated by prejudice while placing yourself as some cool calm caring person looking out for people. The reality is you your worldview on this issue actively endangers people’s lives and because you can’t grasp an issue in a certain way and you’d rather insult and make pretty unfounded accusations at those who point it out while thinking this is an acceptable and nice thing to do? How is that friendly? Maybe you genuinely meant it in a friendly way but it seemed a little loaded to me We literally have customs and rules over identity for a reason. Safety is a large reason. This is basic level obvious stuff right, surely? Your policy is let’s just hope people aren’t good? In what other setting would anyone think like that? Shall we have no checks for schools? No background checks anyone can be teacher or anyone can adopt? What world are you living in where this makes one iota of sense? You want other people to risk their children’s safety for the most ridiculous of stances and it’s just never going to happen and not only that when it inevitably goes bad you’ve positioned yourself where you’ll never change that view. So you can have all logic fact and evidence against it and still be stubborn and faux morally superior. Like I said before this isn’t a game this is real life. People have families and some people here have to be less selfish because your bizarre way of looking at things will never come before that. I don’t really know what the rest is going on about do you really believe people don’t know immigrants or aren’t descendants of immigrants themselves to an extent? Do you really think immigrants all support unvetted boats? Where even do you guys live? I’m in Camden London one school I went to QK( Quintin Kynaston)was like 30% Muslim I’d spend a lot of time just learning the religion to essentially debate it with them because I couldn’t believe some things they believed. One Egyptian guy gave me a gold plated Quran as a gift and was like one day you’ll see the light. One of my friends brothers who was also at the school literally joined ISIS. To this day a Somali guy I grew up with iMessages videos with his dog as I cured his phobia of dogs. Yet you talk like I’m a 72 yr old bald fry up merchant who lives in the Isle of dogs or something. People are able to be immigrants make it their home and treat it like their home and most people do not want their home to be a free for all. This outdated notion that all immigrants are on one side and bald headed racists are on another is very out of touch and I can’t help but think people don’t really live among a lot of different people or escape their bubbles often not to get that by now. Hence why it’s hard to really entertain things where evidence and logic is overlooked in favour of weaponised buzzwords and think that’s really going to do anything? You need a substantial credible argument on the issue and yours seems to be the erosion of a nation state where border controls and background checks don’t exist and I don’t think that’s sensible or realistic
  12. Bit of a generic word salad mixed with pathos to be honest with you. Removing the disingenuous framing of immigrants. The specific boat arrivals do not really fall under that bracket. These are often unidentifiable. So you cannot know their history. You don’t know who they are. This is clearly unsafe. To anyone sensible at least. You not only do not acknowledge that reality but you’ve kind of justified anything that happens in your mind with ‘crime exists’ so if inevitably horrific crimes do not place well crime exists elsewhere too so what can you do. By that logic you can justify anything. It’s literally as morally bankrupt as you get. Other people should be at risk because you cannot get your head around something obvious? So the whole world is deserving of British public services? That’s your view? No undeserving or deserving? Let’s change it from NHS to WHS since it’s a world health service apparently. There are millions of immigrants in the UK with various views and likewise every race has different views too so you know you cannot co-opt a term like immigrants and think it’s represented by yourself. I can promise you millions of immigrants in the UK have pretty varied views. Were people not told having too many kids isn’t good? Bad for the planet? And now we need immigration to solve a ‘crisis’ of what 74 million people by 2034? Besides most of the issues have nothing much to do with that. To say not backed by wider public opinion is pretty interesting. Can’t think of an issue more one sided in public opinion. I think I saw 27 councils including various Labour councils considering legal action to remove such hotels so it’s clearly a widespread sentiment. I mean all you see is people saying they applied for 2 thousand jobs or people saying they can get a decent job along with layoffs all over the place and automation becoming more commonplace so the direction is going to be the biggest welfare bill of all-time if you cannot control numbers. If a country is run properly it can have healthy levels of immigration. This false dichotomy people have with immigration where you either support a nation states destruction or be seen as anti-immigrant is absurd. It is a whole industry now. A restaurant will apply for a visa for three cleaners and a chef from somewhere who can each bring 2-3 dependents and then they just say they’re Christian or gay and they can stay forever. It’s a very heavily exploited system. There is no desire by people to fix it or question it because essentially they’re open borders at heart and think opposing any immigration is prejudice so instead of accountability for their worldview causing havoc they insult those affected. That’s literally the whole point. It is happening. Should we pretend it’s not because the denial brigade will bring up Jimmy Saville or something? You cannot just endlessly do things against voters wishes with horrific repercussions. Hence why yourself went from saying reform will implode to now acting like them winning will be inevitable. I’m not completely sold on it but if the collective head in the sand is the response to the average voters biggest concern how will they not win?
  13. Guarantee at least 10 more variants coming over the next five weeks
  14. Just separate issues really. You can’t really throw those issues with this one. But if we take what you’re saying it kind of only adds to the initial point. There are less and less jobs for various reasons so what would be the need for 800k people per year? This seems obvious. Ideologues are just positioning themselves into a completely ridiculous position to the point where they’re insulting people not wanting random unknown men hanging around their children. Truly lost the plot
  15. Because ultimately it’s an issue of numbers more than anything and that problem was never addressed. The problem with EU migration was that a lot of countries were a lot poorer than the UK. So they worked the same jobs here for a lot less than people were being paid. You can’t import people who work for less drive down wages or drive people out of work altogether then create an unsustainable welfare system and blame people on that system. Tons had good paying jobs and they were decimated. There are consequences to bad policies. Nobody is a bigger enabler to Farage than the people who drone on about fascism and they never ever have accountability over the issues or problems being faced. Their solutions are to say the problems don’t exist and if you say they exist you’re a negative label of some sort. They have no desire to acknowledge any problems so of course they have no solutions. They just oppose people who are acknowledging those issues and delude themselves into thinking that’s anti-racism. Totally clueless.