Removing Jeremey was definitely an overreaction imo. Ken has said much worse, but I want Ken to stay as he's interesting and mixing it up.

I have caught up with this (not the thread, i will go back and read that later) but i was disgusted by Ken. I went into the episode with him being in my top 2 housemates !! but he really showed himself up to be a horrid creature. I think it was right to remove Jeremy, he was drunk, unstable and his action was really distasteful whether he intended it to be or not.

 

Aside: please please please pray for me. Perez "disgusting pig" Hilton is.... growing on me :mellow: :mellow: HELP ME.

I think it was right to remove Jeremy, he was drunk, unstable and his action was really distasteful whether he intended it to be or not.

 

But why the hell would you walk round in a house naked under a gown, when your around strangers and cameras 3 days in. It's silly imo.

But why the hell would you walk round in a house naked under a gown, when your around strangers and cameras 3 days in. It's silly imo.

I disagree with this tbf. She should be able to walk around however she wants as i don't think she would have ever expected to have her gown opened by someone else. It was perhaps a little silly to have absolutely nothing underneath, i agree with you there, but it was her choice to do that and she is fully entitled to without fear of being exposed.

Sorry Simon but I dont understand this attitude, she was going in to look after him as she was concerned and Cami and Nadia were there as well ... not like she went in with any other intention.

 

Not sure how Ken being in there being racist or a mysognistic pig is interesting either but hey ho.

Sorry Simon but I dont understand this attitude, she was going in to look after him as she was concerned and Cami and Nadia were there as well ... not like she went in with any other intention.

 

:lol: I get she was trying to help, I'm not saying he's in the wrong cause he's really not, just think it was overreacting to throw him out over it, I think Ken's been worse. Her walking around with nothing on under a gown is just me finding it odd, especially when she's only known these people 3 days, I just find that a little silly.

I suppose, she just probably didnt think or was getting ready for bed? I dunno.

 

I think she and Ken will definetly stay this week and Alexander will go.

 

 

:lol: I get she was trying to help, I'm not saying he's in the wrong cause he's really not, just think it was overreacting to throw him out over it, I think Ken's been worse. Her walking around with nothing on under a gown is just me finding it odd, especially when she's only known these people 3 days, I just find that a little silly.

My mum actually has the same opinion on this tbh :lol: I just think it's one huge misunderstanding. I still think like everyone else that Ken should have definitely been kicked out. I'm fairly sure if he does say something like that again then I'm hoping they actually do remove him otherwise BB will just sink to another all time low for me.

Edited January 11, 201510 yr by Rob S

I'd imagine Chloe was probably literally just going to bed, and then rushed to help Jeremy and didn't think of getting changed because she just wanted to help and not leave it? Especially if he's a recovering alcoholic, I still think the producers should foot some of the blame for making alcohol readily available to a recovering alcoholic and therefore basically facilitating a relapse on national TV.

 

I don't know if it was on here or twitter or wherever but I saw someone say that they probably realised letting Jeremy in there in the first place was a huge mistake and they probably wanted rid of him and jumped at the first chance. I think less people would be questioning it if they didn't keep Ken for his arguably (given he's not a recovering alcoholic and was acting like it all day just out of greed and wanting the money) worse behaviour!

C5 always favour certain disgusting individuals who they want to win though, see Helen, Jim and Conor ... all of which should have been kicked out really.

True :drama:

 

 

I cannot even imagine how the public wold react if it was Katie acting like Ken!

I kind of actually expected Katie to be a lot more controversial than she is being, she is kind of tame now. I always have thought it was a bit of an act though.

I'd imagine Chloe was probably literally just going to bed

 

Even that though just going to bed and no underwear :lol: What if someone drunk went and got into her bed not realising. 3 days and no underwear is too much for me to fathom :lol: Maybe that's just me being a grumps or something.

I kind of actually expected Katie to be a lot more controversial than she is being, she is kind of tame now. I always have thought it was a bit of an act though.

I don't think she is being tame, she's actually being perfectly honest in cases like when she said "at least they're working" about children in sweatshops, her nomination for Perez, saying that she found Ken funny when everyone was like 'that's disgusting'. I think she's actually being more realistic and genuine, we can't expect 24 hours of insult after insult but yet I do still find her refreshing when we do get glimpses of the fact she isn't afraid to be honest.

As for the dressing gown thing, I rarely ever have clothes on underneath a dressing gown, it's a replacement for clothes for me? And I know everyone says how hot the bedroom is.

Oh dont get me wrong, I do like her and I think she is showing a vulnerable/caring side as well which is always nice. I guess I just expected more nastiness ... I suppose thats just because I am only used to seeing her being a bitch though idk.

I guess normally Katie is on TV to give her views (like when she's on This Morning or those debate things that they had about immigration and benefits) so she's naturally going to give them (and I think that's why she exaggerates them a bit but that's another matter), whereas here she isn't necessarily there to give her views so she only has the odd quip when she's given the opportunity (tasks, diary room, nominations etc). I think it's good that she's being given a chance to show she is a slightly human and multi-faceted, not just a horrible monstrous woman who hates everyone.

As for the dressing gown thing, I rarely ever have clothes on underneath a dressing gown, it's a replacement for clothes for me? And I know everyone says how hot the bedroom is.

 

I completely agree with you. Clothes underneath or not, it's always unacceptable to pull down a lady's dressing gown.

As for the dressing gown thing, I rarely ever have clothes on underneath a dressing gown, it's a replacement for clothes for me? And I know everyone says how hot the bedroom is.

 

Hmm never thought of it that way, but then again I never wear a dressing gown. But for me I just wouldn't not have had underwear on around strangers and live TV. I'd be too worried in case it blew open :lol:

Can Perez just get lost already.