Jump to content

Featured Replies

Its what Right Wing people do

 

100% this.

 

Bojo is vile and is an extremely bad role model for anyone, as is Farage, and yet Vidcapper targets a left wing rapper he knows nothing about :rolleyes:

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Views 124.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What bothers me is that rap stars are seldom good role models for the young...

 

I wouldn't say I'm a fan of his music at all, but he's an intelligent guy with a perfectly sound head on his shoulders. I can't see why he wouldn't be.

 

He's engaging people in politics, what's wrong with that?

He's engaging people in politics, what's wrong with that?

 

Agreed... the right-wingers no doubt thing he's engaging/ encouraging the wrong type of people (ie young people)

What bothers me is that rap stars are seldom good role models for the young...

 

 

 

Well most are off their faces most of the time on drugs.

Edited by common sense

I wouldn't say I'm a fan of his music at all, but he's an intelligent guy with a perfectly sound head on his shoulders. I can't see why he wouldn't be.

 

He's engaging people in politics, what's wrong with that?

 

 

He's a rapper so that means we shouldn't listen to him.

 

That's what I gathered :lol: :lol:

Well most are off their faces most of the time on drugs.

 

 

Know some personally do you?

Know some personally do you?

 

Ironic considering he was all "you don't know me!!!!" to me the other day when I called him out on something. :rolleyes:

Just like some Tory mps then. Remember the leadership farce? Lololol. Blojo still refusing to answer about cocaine! There was one posh evil man who looked off his tits in parliament - the one who wears glasses and looks super gormless.
Just like some Tory mps then. Remember the leadership farce? Lololol. Blojo still refusing to answer about cocaine! There was one posh evil man who looked off his tits in parliament - the one who wears glasses and looks super gormless.

 

 

Who's that then? You've got me wondering. What party is he in. Do you mean the new slim Watson?

Ironic considering he was all "you don't know me!!!!" to me the other day when I called him out on something. :rolleyes:

 

Erm..he's right though? You don't know him.

 

It's just very hard to take you seriously when we all know that the only reason you take issue with him is because you know that most people who signed up to vote off of the back of what he did are most likely to vote Labour. I mean, Chris thats it basically isn't it?

 

Had it been somebody with audience more likely to vote for the Conservatives you would have either A. Fully endorsed them or B. Not said anything.

 

Like Boris banning the Daily Mirror from his bus - the only paper thats been remotely critical of him and his government. Somehow that's OK with you, when we all know full well that had Labour pulled a stunt like that you would be on here whining about it.

 

So why not just admit that?

Diane Abbott’s son accused of assaulting police officer outside Foreign Office

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/121...Stoke-Newington

 

OK, it could be argued that this is irrelevant, but as his mother is hoping to be the next Home Secretary, she could be possibly be put in an awkward 'conflict of interest' position. :unsure:

How do we know the same thing hasn’t happened to one of the children Johnson hasn’t admitted to fathering?

How do we know the same thing hasn’t happened to one of the children Johnson hasn’t admitted to fathering?

 

How do we know there *are* any? :teresa:

Edited by vidsanta

How do we know there *are* any? :teresa:

 

Bit like the accusation you made in a previous thread about Diane Abbott.

Labour's latest attempt to grab a few more votes. Corbyn says he won't use Chequers but let homeless families live there instead. McDonnell won't live at No.11 but let a homeless family move in too. Emily Thornberry says she wouldn't use Chevening, traditionally the Foreign Secretary's country residence for entertaining guests and let homeless in too. As if the security folk are ever going to let those buildings be occupied by homeless people, especially No.11 which is connected by a passage and door to No.10. Laughable. They just won't. Too much of a security risk so a non-starter really.

Edited by Crazy Chris-tmas

I’m sure most homeless people would just be grateful for somewhere warm to stay, maybe so much so that bursting into no.10 (which probably has very sufficient security) is probably the furthest thing from their minds.
Well yes and it's a very good gesture from them. If only they had a better leader.....
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.