November 30, 20195 yr M!! He signals for interviewers to stop questions ANGRILY and they comply, as he is their overlord. WEAK. No. Yesterday's LBC incident has been debunked. He was copying the editor who made the mouth sign just before him, to get the producer to get the caller off. Edited November 30, 20195 yr by common sense
November 30, 20195 yr Author No. The media was protecting him and leapt into action ehen he wanted to ditch a question about the nhs.
November 30, 20195 yr No. The media was protecting him and leapt into action ehen he wanted to ditch a question about the nhs. Oh well if the media is protecting him a bit if it helps us not get Corbyn in No.10 it'll be a job well done. :)
December 2, 20195 yr So you admit the media are on the tories side to keep the establishment in power?
December 2, 20195 yr So you admit the media are on the tories side to keep the establishment in power? Maybe a bit but we need a Tory government returned to get Brexit done. Remember it's oven ready.
December 2, 20195 yr The oven hasn't even been switched on. At any rate the tories always find a reason to ask you to vote for them - they are addicted to power!
December 3, 20195 yr Remember it's oven ready. I prefer the term 'half baked', or to put it another way - 'this is just the withdrawal agreement that confirms how much we are paying the EU (£39 bn), agrees citizens rights once the UK is outside the EU, both of UK citizens in EU countries and vice-versa, and also border and customs arrangements such as keeping Northern Ireland in the single market/customs union. It speaks nothing to the trade arrangements that will be thrashed out over the (at least) next 3 years, nor the fact that the Tories have thrown away much of their bargaining position by stubbornly refusing to extend the transition period to beyond 31 December 2020 despite the fact that an extension will be required to get something favourable, meaning the EU can do exactly what they did last time and offer whatever terms they want and wait for the UK to be forced into accepting them under time constraints.'
December 3, 20195 yr The oven hasn't even been switched on. At any rate the tories always find a reason to ask you to vote for them - they are addicted to power! Are you sure that Corbyn's motives for wanting power are so pure?
December 4, 20195 yr Author https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/jeremy-co...QAnJx9wyq9Y7iWs Corbyn has officially called out BBTory bias.
December 4, 20195 yr https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/jeremy-co...QAnJx9wyq9Y7iWs Corbyn has officially called out BBTory bias. Yes, three months ago, in an non-mainstream article... :rolleyes:
December 4, 20195 yr No but I agree with this economic, foreign policy and social views. What about the fact that he'd keep a nuclear deterrent but would never use it?
December 4, 20195 yr Yes, three months ago, in an non-mainstream article... :rolleyes: 'i' has won numerous journalism awards (including Newspaper of the Year) and, as of last week, is owned by the Daily Mail. Perhaps you'll want to start reading it now. Michael less so. @1200392648667860992 Edited December 4, 20195 yr by blacksquare
December 4, 20195 yr 'i' has won numerous journalism awards (including Newspaper of the Year) and, as of last week, is owned by the Daily Mail. Perhaps you'll want to start reading it now. Michael less so. @1200392648667860992 It isn't owned by the Daily Mail yet. It has to be approve by the Competition and Markets Authority.
December 5, 20195 yr What about the fact that he'd keep a nuclear deterrent but would never use it? I agree wholeheartedly as I don't want a PM acting like a strongman which could potentially kill millions of people(even though in reality they would have no power as the United States holds all the cards here). One thing I would say is that they shouldn't have it in the first place.
December 5, 20195 yr I agree wholeheartedly as I don't want a PM acting like a strongman which could potentially kill millions of people(even though in reality they would have no power as the United States holds all the cards here). One thing I would say is that they shouldn't have it in the first place. Now that really would be the ultimate collusion with the Russians.
December 5, 20195 yr Author Now that really would be the ultimate collusion with the Russians. We don't need nukes. The end.
December 5, 20195 yr We don't need nukes. The end. The country would be virtually defenceless. I believe there was a Yes Minister episode on this? :unsure:
December 5, 20195 yr The country would be virtually defenceless. I believe there was a Yes Minister episode on this? :unsure: You mean we would be like almost every other country in the world?
Create an account or sign in to comment