btw, are both acts Norwegian or Swedish :kink:

 

btw Swedish Meatballs FTW :wub:

 

 

OMG, Caroline is A.M.A.Z.I.N.G. :wub: :wub: :wub:

 

Aura good too, but a bit annoying :lol:

 

And I'm with you on the meatballs Mikey :kink:

Aura is Danish, but doing well currently in the German charts (my source of whether a song is decent or not of course)

 

Caroline is of course Swedish, and is (Cascada) Natalie Horler's slightly less pretty twin sister;

 

http://carolinejonsson.net/lytebox/index.html

OMG, Caroline is A.M.A.Z.I.N.G. :wub: :wub: :wub:

 

Aura good too, but a bit annoying :lol:

 

And I'm with you on the meatballs Mikey :kink:

 

thanks Tom :D

 

I'm pretty certain it's Caroline for Rontvia XXII - I deliberately didn't put a video link to the song in my chart, despite it already being in there :kink:

Cool :funky:

 

Caroline is of course Swedish, and is (Cascada) Natalie Horler's slightly less pretty twin sister;

 

http://carolinejonsson.net/lytebox/index.html

 

There's not a lot in it tbh :lol:

Aura is Danish, but doing well currently in the German charts (my source of whether a song is decent or not of course)

 

Caroline is of course Swedish, and is (Cascada) Natalie Horler's slightly less pretty twin sister;

 

http://carolinejonsson.net/lytebox/index.html

 

 

I can't see much difference to be honest :lol:

 

Whatever rocks your boat :teresa:

Aura is Danish, but doing well currently in the German charts (my source of whether a song is decent or not of course)

ICH BIN SCHNAPPI, DAS KLEINE KROKODIL

ICH BIN SCHNAPPI, DAS KLEINE KROKODIL

 

that song was so good, it even made the UK top 40

 

despite being IN GERMAN!

Are we judging good on chart positions these days Rich? :(

Are we judging good on chart positions these days Rich? :(

 

What if you loved it then? :P

 

 

And chart positions has to be some part of the quality criteria?

 

I'd say it's a 50-50% subjective to objective criteria to what defines a good song.

 

Chart position could be that 50% in a way I guess, but if a song "isn't good" at all, and several million people like the song... well..

Edited November 18, 200915 yr by Freeze

I can give you two words to automatically prove that chart positions have NOTHING to do with musical merit - Crazy Frog :P

I can give you two words to automatically prove that chart positions have NOTHING to do with musical merit - Crazy Frog :P

 

Careful now.. there must be hundreds/thousands of words to automatically prove the opposite! :P

Edited November 18, 200915 yr by Freeze

Just while i have my PC iTunes open i thought i'd do a wee Rontvia update

 

06 || Smack Me || 289

30 || Music Everywhere || 143

37 || Boys & Girls || 135

45 || Headhunted || 123

75 || Mine All Mine || 96

 

 

A little proof to everyone else too, i do genuinely adore Rontvia entries.

 

For Smack Me to breach the Sugababes strong hold and get into my top10 is a huge achievement. It'll take a while to get top5, Now You're Gone is 5th with 338 plays which is 9 plays behind About You Now in 2nd. It'll take a very long time to top my #1 at a massive 484 plays.

:o have a nice time! I've seen both of these acts live before :heart: although Example really only has a couple of decent songs :lol:

LOVED IT :wub: Lily was great as was Example actually. I was pleasently surprised at how good he and his songs were! :o Especially his new single :wub:

Careful now.. there must be hundreds/thousands of words to automatically prove the opposite! :P

Nuh uh, you only have to show good songs that didn't chart well - good songs charting well doesn't prove that charting well is mutually exclusive with being good, but good songs not charting well disproves it! :P

Nuh uh, you only have to show good songs that didn't chart well - good songs charting well doesn't prove that charting well is mutually exclusive with being good, but good songs not charting well disproves it! :P

 

Pfft.. now you're just picking the flowers you like the most - I never said charting well proves that the song is good, just that the 50% criteria for it being so, is fullfilled :P

 

It definitely proves something in form of some positive sort of quality in the songs.

 

And it can well be that the good songs that doesn't chart well, just hasn't been able to come into the marked for evaluation, but I know you've already figured that out.

 

And even if they have, and still haven't mega charted... well, you're still only 50% correct Kopecka, just deal with it :drama: :smoke:

Edited November 19, 200915 yr by Freeze

Ah, but you haven't given a reason WHY it should have a 50% bearing? :smoke:

And chart positions has to be some part of the quality criteria?

 

 

 

Chart position could be that 50% in a way I guess, but if a song "isn't good" at all, and several million people like the song... well..

 

Respond to this first pls -_-

 

 

Then you can tell me what actually defines a good song, and answer me why you disagree on this statement of mine:

 

I'd say it's a 50-50% subjective to objective criteria to what defines a good song.

 

And if you agree, then there's nothing to talk about now, is it? :P

 

 

 

Besides, you haven't said anything about WHY "good songs not charting" disproves my point. First come first served tbh -_-

 

So serve me :kink:

I can give you two words to automatically prove that chart positions have NOTHING to do with musical merit - Crazy Frog :P

 

good songs not charting well disproves it! :P

 

:P And you know.. first you say that if a bad song charts well, it disproves me - and automatically agree on charting as a form of measurement for quality. Then you say.. yeah.. the opposite, which is really bi***y -_-

 

 

So 50% it is then :smoke:

I can give you two words to automatically prove that chart positions have NOTHING to do with musical merit - Crazy Frog :P

 

well seeing as 90% of my entries are sent before charting in any territory you'll see that I actually don't use this factor to determine my entries :lol: I'd far rather send something that hasn't charted anywhere in fact so it's new to more people!

 

as far as the Kopecka/Greenfroze chart debate goes, I'd say that of course it has some factor in quality at least

 

Oops...I Did It Again #1

Baby One More Time #1

Toxic #1

 

---------------

 

Don't Let Me Be The Last To Know #12

I Love Rock 'N' Roll #13

 

the Britney fans know when they hear a good song :P