According to former Secret Service agents who know her much better than any of us does, Michelle's not very nice at all, stuck-up and looks down on many people and that included her bodyguards. Obama is nicer and was much more polite to them apparently. They've written a book about former first families. Hillary's not very nice at all they say but Bill is okay. None of them wanted to be assigned to Hillary!

Bullshit.

 

 

Every single verifiable former Clinton staffer that has gone on record is on record saying how kind and caring and compassionate that she is.

 

 

There's also thousands upon thousands of stories out there about just how lovely Michelle is.

I mean, there are some pretty well verified stories of Hillary being a total cow to her security detail at times, but I find it difficult to believe most people under supervision 24/7 wouldn't lash out on occasion.

 

(My favourite one is a 15 year old Chelsea Clinton ending a call to her friend with "gotta go, the pigs are here", before a mortified Secret Service officer asks why she'd refer to someone there to be the last defence between her and an incoming bullet in that way. "What's the problem, that's what mom and dad call you all the time?")

Donald's not a happy man at all. He was ranting last night that the election's a total fix by the Establishment. Also that Hillary had taken drugs just before the last debate and that's why she seemed hyped up. He wants them both to take a drugs test. When he loses he's not going to take it well at all!

Trump has been whinging about the election being rigged for weeks. He's also been moaning abut the "biased media". Perhaps somebody should send him some examples of what the British press have said about various Labour leaders (or the EU) so that he can see what a biased press is really like.

Hopefully it's a little like the 2002 French presidential election where the final few weeks made the country unify itself against the holocaust-denying, neo-fascist Jean-Marie Le Pen who accidentally managed to get to the final round against Jacques Chirac but ended up managing a hilarious 16.86% of the vote when it became clear just how extreme he was.

At this point, I believe that there are only three feasible, but highly improbable circumstances under which Donald Trump can defeat Hilary Clinton come November 9th, any of which only have a 1% or less chance of occurring, and all of which are outside the control of either Clinton or Trump -

 

1. Hilary Clinton dies before the election, and in the confusion, the American public vote for Trump instead.

2. Donald Trump survives a genuine assassination attempt before the election, and gets voted in on a mixture of sympathy and resilience under adversity.

3. There is another major terrorist attack on US soil in the coming weeks, which leads the voters to Trump, whose tough rhetoric would be more appealing in such circumstances.

 

Of the three improbable options, #2 seems the most likely to actually happen. There's already been one individual who tried to assassinate Trump during one of his rallies (which as I mentioned before, ironically didn't come to pass because the Republican Party had declared the event a gun-free zone), and just tonight the Republican headquarters of North Carolina (which is one of the Republican heavy states which looks like it could be won by the Democrats), has been firebombed, thankfully with no fatalities.

 

#1 would depend entirely on the stupidity of the American voting population as to what happens if a presidential contender dies before the election takes place, and who would succeed if such a thing was to happen. The one thing that counts in Trump's favour is that stupidity enjoys cross-party support.

How anyone can support Hillary Clinton is beyond me, I knew this anyway but this video is just shocking. It's trending everywhere.

 

Edited October 18, 20168 yr by PeaceMob

As she is a great, qualified candidate vs an orangutang sex pest?

 

Posting Trump conspiracies is just dumb x100.

How anyone can support Hillary Clinton is beyond me

You support a white supremacist who boasts about sexually assaulting women.

You support a white supremacist who boasts about sexually assaulting women.

 

Yet more slanderous comments about him, it's just relentless.

 

Yet more slanderous comments about him, it's just relentless.

You're being either disingenuous or a complete moron if you dismiss things about Trump that are a matter of public record, but hold up as gospel accusations against Clinton that require about five different chains of circumstantial evidence.

You're being either disingenuous or a complete moron if you dismiss things about Trump that are a matter of public record, but hold up as gospel accusations against Clinton that require about five different chains of circumstantial evidence.

So has Trump been convicted of some of these accusations flying about or are you going to keep making these slanderous comments?

Edited October 18, 20168 yr by PeaceMob

So has Trump been convicted of some of these accusations flying about or are you going to keep making these slanderous comments?

...no, because boasting about sexually assaulting women is not a crime? Neither is holding white supremacist opinions? Both, again, a matter of public record. Not really sure what you're trying to prove here other than the equivalent of screaming 'THE SKY IS RED!'. All you have to do is watch the news.

 

And if you're on about the sexual assault allegations themselves - how many trials have you ever known to begin and come to a conclusion in the space of two weeks?

...no, because boasting about sexually assaulting women is not a crime? Neither is holding white supremacist opinions? Both, again, a matter of public record. Not really sure what you're trying to prove here other than the equivalent of screaming 'THE SKY IS RED!'. All you have to do is watch the news.

 

And if you're on about the sexual assault allegations themselves - how many trials have you ever known to begin and come to a conclusion in the space of two weeks?

 

Well clearly you've made up your mind on whether Trump sexually assaulted women and him being a white supremacist because according to you "all you have to do is watch the news".

Edited October 18, 20168 yr by PeaceMob

Well clearly you've made up your mind on whether Trump sexually assaulted women and him being a white supremacist because according to you "all you have to do is watch the news".

My original post said "you support a white supremacist who boasts about sexually assaulting women". That he boasts about sexually assaulting women isn't in question - yes, all you have to do is watch the news.

 

That he's a white supremacist isn't really a particularly controversial point either. He has said "laziness is a trait in blacks". He claimed a judge with a Latino background would not be able to judge him impartially because of his policies on Mexico - a claim he would never dream of making about a white judge. He believes all Muslims should have their rights to come to America curtailed because a small proportion of Muslims commit terrorist acts - an oppression he would never enforce upon all whites. He believes other races should be oppressed, treated more strictly, or not trusted, for reasons of caution on the basis of the behaviour of other people of their race. He would never force such treatment on white people.

 

That is white supremacism - it contains at its core the assumption that white people are superior morally, have superior agency and should not be judged by the actions of fellow people of their race, and should therefore enjoy superior rights. Are you a bit slow?

Now now Tyron, you know facts confuse Craig.

Oh that's Craig? What a blast from the past!

Ohh so Craig is back??

 

What a surprise that he supports fascist inexperienced Donald Trump :lol:

Edited October 19, 20168 yr by skankhunt42

Ohh so Craig is back??

 

What a surprise that he supports fascist inexperienced Donald Drumpf :lol:

I don't know why but the juxtaposition of "fascist" and "inexperienced" made me laugh. The political equivalent of "arson, murder and jaywalking".