Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 372
  • Views 25.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There needs to be a root and branch review of the BBC from the top down. This is what I expect from the media in Russia, China and North Korea. Not a functioning democracy
  • Author
Our democracy has failed. Once you let the Tories in, they'll never get out. They have turned the BBTory into state propaganda.
  • Author
They edited this and they edited the memorial day footage to protect him. Absolutely vile. Axe the BBTory!! Give Doc Who and Esstenders to ITV. They'll do a better job with them anyway.
Don't see anything wrong with editing booing out. It's disrespectful to boo our newly elected PM so the BBC was right imo to edit it out. Nothing to see here folks.
They edited this and they edited the memorial day footage to protect him. Absolutely vile. Axe the BBTory!! Give Doc Who and Esstenders to ITV. They'll do a better job with them anyway.

 

 

The memorial day editing was a genuine mistake and we've moved on since then.

I watched both of these clips again from the programmes where they were broadcast, the BBC News broadcast at 1pm is only a 12 minute programme and they would have only edited it to reduce the length of the clip - they cut out the bit where Johnson was stuttering and repeating himself so they can get straight to his answer, and they would have cut out the applause as well if the applause wasn't still going on when his full sentence started. They did the same for the applause after a question to Jo Swinson (cutting it out to get straight from the question to the answer), so I doubt it's bias but rather just clipping the video to fit in their short broadcast time.
Don't see anything wrong with editing booing out. It's disrespectful to boo our newly elected PM so the BBC was right imo to edit it out. Nothing to see here folks.

:lol: You’re the perfect pawn to live in a dictatorship.

  • Author
An unelected oaf not fit for office who doesn't deserve any respect. At all. Enjoy your dictatorship x The BBTory has shown with this that what happened with the memorial footage was NOT a mistake, not that it ever COULD have been one, seeing as they had to delve deep into the archives for it.
I watched both of these clips again from the programmes where they were broadcast, the BBC News broadcast at 1pm is only a 12 minute programme and they would have only edited it to reduce the length of the clip - they cut out the bit where Johnson was stuttering and repeating himself so they can get straight to his answer, and they would have cut out the applause as well if the applause wasn't still going on when his full sentence started. They did the same for the applause after a question to Jo Swinson (cutting it out to get straight from the question to the answer), so I doubt it's bias but rather just clipping the video to fit in their short broadcast time.

 

 

See folks. The real explanation. Have just watched them again too and coi is spot on. The fact Jo was edited too means there was no bias and am sure the BBC will point that out.

An unelected oaf not fit for office who doesn't deserve any respect. At all. Enjoy your dictatorship x The BBTory has shown with this that what happened with the memorial footage was NOT a mistake, not that it ever COULD have been one, seeing as they had to delve deep into the archives for it.

 

 

So are you saying the BBC tells lies too? :rolleyes:

Union leaders have reacted with dismay to the Conservatives proposing to introduce laws to prevent all-out rail strikes.

 

The party, which is due to unveil its manifesto on Sunday, has announced plans to legislate for minimum train services to run during industrial action in the event that it secures a majority government in the upcoming election.

 

Train operators and unions would be required to sign an agreement to run a minimum number of services in the event of strikes.

 

The Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) trade union has pledged to lobby against any attempt to stop its members from going on strike.

See folks. The real explanation. Have just watched them again too and coi is spot on. The fact Jo was edited too means there was no bias and am sure the BBC will point that out.

Somehow, I don't think the Daily Mail would have accepted that excuse if they had cut Jeremy Corbyn being booed.

The memorial day editing was a genuine mistake and we've moved on since then.

 

Stop using "we" and "our" as if you speak for any of us, because you don't.

They edited this and they edited the memorial day footage to protect him. Absolutely vile. Axe the BBTory!! Give Doc Who and Esstenders to ITV. They'll do a better job with them anyway.

 

You do remember that 'no adverts' is one of the BBC's main selling points?

I watched both of these clips again from the programmes where they were broadcast, the BBC News broadcast at 1pm is only a 12 minute programme and they would have only edited it to reduce the length of the clip - they cut out the bit where Johnson was stuttering and repeating himself so they can get straight to his answer, and they would have cut out the applause as well if the applause wasn't still going on when his full sentence started. They did the same for the applause after a question to Jo Swinson (cutting it out to get straight from the question to the answer), so I doubt it's bias but rather just clipping the video to fit in their short broadcast time.

@1198355862408052737

@1198968230955622400

 

The response from the BBC seems to match up with what I said - and I said it first :D

Editing out one second of laughter still leaves a lasting impression, especially critical during an election. His response seemed far more confident than the reality. The BBC shouldn’t be making mistakes like this so often, intended or not. I’m unconvinced.

 

@1198669583340724235

 

Compared to the Labour manifesto, Boris Johnson's plan for the country is a shopping list of promises, not an encyclopaedia of ambitions.

 

How is this impartial and balanced? It’s classic spin.

Edited by blacksquare

Stop using "we" and "our" as if you speak for any of us, because you don't.

 

 

I mean us the general public and not all you Boris and Tory haters here.

I mean us the general public and not all you Boris and Tory haters here.

 

The general public consists of many different people with different opinions, you might speak for some of them but you certainly don't speak for many.

 

We don't like him because his actions and his party are despicable and he doesn't give a shit about vulnerable people on society.

 

It's not about "winning" or "losing", this isn't an episode of X Factor.

 

Stop being so bloody childish. You're what, 65?

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.