Jump to content

Featured Replies

I knew you hating the Kunts selling well was all about you being a massive Tory supporter.

 

You know nothing.

 

I stated why I wasn't in favour of the song. It was because of the performer and him alone.

 

You don't believe me? Tough.

 

And yes, people do have to take responsibility for their own actions but let’s not absolve this awful party of theirs. This government were adamant the schools needed to be running as usual, even when it became clear that this was not a good idea last December and even threatened a local authority with legal action for safeguarding students and staff. Schools is a place where people from many different households were mixing for a solid four months, following government instructions. You can’t blame spread on drinkers and people with issues with substance abuse when there was so much opportunity for the virus to spread within the rules.

 

Haven't absolved the Tories of anything. I do think they are culpable but not to the extent that you and others slevver on about.

 

Not one instance of the virus being spread because of addicts?

 

Nighty night, Mickey.

  • Replies 100
  • Views 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You know nothing.

 

I stated why I wasn't in favour of the song. It was because of the performer and him alone.

 

You don't believe me? Tough.

Haven't absolved the Tories of anything. I do think they are culpable but not to the extent that you and others slevver on about.

 

Not one instance of the virus being spread because of addicts?

 

Nighty night, Mickey.

 

No one ever said addicts haven’t spread the virus. I’m absolutely certain they have just like pretty much every other kind of person. Have you not noticed that there are a lot of non addicts out there that have contracted the virus.

 

What is interesting is you singling out addicts with a complete lack of compassion for them. Tells me everything I need to know about you.

I haven't said people stopped doing anything because of others but it's incorrect to say it's ONLY the Tories that have broken rules.

 

In Scotland, the Chief Medical Officer was found to have breached guidelines, as too was an MP who represents the Scottish National Party.

 

Tory? :huh:

 

Remind me: Did the Chief Medical Officer resign? Or did she stay on, hold a press conference making up a load of waffle and expended vital public trust in order to keep her job.

 

Hmm.

No one ever said addicts haven’t spread the virus. I’m absolutely certain they have just like pretty much every other kind of person. Have you not noticed that there are a lot of non addicts out there that have contracted the virus.

 

I mentioned people not wearing face masks in shops. How is that singling out addicts?

 

Do you expect me to list every permutation of how the virus can be spread?

 

I've referred to SOME that I feel are important and have been overlooked.

 

What is interesting is you singling out addicts with a complete lack of compassion for them. Tells me everything I need to know about you.

 

Again, you know nothing about me.

 

Not all addicts are blameless or even want help. Those that do should get it.

 

They want some excitement in their life? Fine, but at what cost?

I know you think you know everything about everything hence the stanky attitude and the not so thinly veiled sense of superiority... but who the f*** are you to judge them anyway?

 

Sincerely,

Flamebaiter.

Edited by b

I know you think you know everything about everything hence the stanky attitude and the not so thinly veiled sense of superiority... but who the f*** are you to judge them anyway?

 

Sincerely,

Flamebaiter.

 

You clearly don't know the laws on libel and slander judging by your public attempt to frame people you don't even know below those who commit criminal acts.

Evidence, Mickey?

1. Slander is oral

2. Good luck with proving your reputation has been damaged

3. Who is Mickey?

1. Slander is oral

2. Good luck with proving your reputation has been damaged

3. Who is Mickey?

 

3. I was Mickey earlier, now it seems to be you. I don’t get it either.

You clearly don't know the laws on libel and slander judging by your public attempt to frame people you don't even know below those who commit criminal acts.

If you can't handle criticism and an argument on an internet forum I suggest you leave perhaps? We've had enough trolls out here as it is. I know this thread is about school meals but we don't need another child who can only resort to confusing namecalling and act in such a disrespectful entitled way when your opinion is being challenged as if anyone was ever targeting you. There's a way to argue without all of this.

 

And I hope you fly to Russia to personally hand me my subpoena for a slander lawsuit.

If you can't handle criticism and an argument on an internet forum I suggest you leave perhaps? We've had enough trolls out here as it is. I know this thread is about school meals but we don't need another child who can only resort to confusing namecalling and act in such a disrespectful entitled way when your opinion is being challenged as if anyone was ever targeting you. There's a way to argue without all of this.

 

And I hope you fly to Russia to personally hand me my subpoena for a slander lawsuit.

 

Saying "who the f**k are you?" isn't disrespectful?

 

What exactly are you accusing me of that apparently makes me unfit to have an opinion?

 

You don't know me.

You know nothing.

 

 

Again, you know nothing about me.

 

 

You don't know me.

I think we got it.

 

Before preaching respect please re-read your posts. "Do one" isn't exactly the most respectful way to handle an opposing opinion :')

Anyone else have the Toni Basil song going around in their head as they read with interest these latest posts?

classic x

 

But srsly, we're approaching immature name calling territory now. Please debate constructively and on-topic or the thread will be locked.

On a more general concern, this whole addict and party-goer framing and blaming is very bad and classist. Come on now, that's not the main way the virus is spreading (and even if it was there's a whole culture of overwork and underpay and lack of social mobility opportunities that leads to that sort of environment, which would be encouraged and allowed by successive Tory governments). You know who has the power to issue rules that the majority of society WILL follow, to say, close workplaces and schools where clearly most mingling is happening?

 

That would not be Mickey with his mickeys hiding out in his den, that would be the government. Who are trying to do everything they can to absolve themselves of their societal responsibility to take care of the population, like, for example, providing free school meals.

Indeed. Well done to Marcus Rashford (again) and Jack Monroe — the absolute state of this government and the opposition.

 

@1349334555807936512

Funny how people like you are sharing the video that deliberately misses the follow up question where Starmer completely destroys Johnson and shows the people who think tweeting is "opposition" what really matters in politics. :rolleyes:

 

People like you think this was a moment that made Starmer look fbad (and you're doing exactly what the Tories want you to do so congratulations!) but only a small percentage of the electorate are on twitter (and Rashford has gone well beyond tweeting in his campaign) but most people saw this as where the government's hypocrisy on the whole scandal was exposed as this was no accident, it was all within the government's own guidelines. Remember who this fight is really about and that is poor parents who are struggling to feed their children. A national (and global) emergency is the last place where they should try and score points and it's difficult when they haven't set their stall out as to what a Labour government would be like of course but I think you'll find people prefer this to just sniping on twitter. When this is over you'll see what opposition really looks like just like you're seeing what actually allowing a leader to be criticised actually looks like.

 

@1349381943331233794

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.