Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 66
  • Views 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • We have ten yearly rounds plus the two semi-finals and grand final so would take up half the year if we had 2 weeks for each which is dragging it out a bit too much. Until recently it was usual to hav

  • It is Apologies; I have got a life outside of this - the results will be up when I've finished counting and writing them up. In the meantime, the 2019 voting is open to vote on

  • Yeah it is a lot of work, especially for 1. I did help out for about 3-4 years before last year. But I had various things going on which meant I couldn't really commit (in fact looking back I;'m surpr

Flames is my first AQ!!! cheer party2

Friends dead last oop

Wasabi new entry and Fuego climbing (may have even grabbed a semi slot with Tilt’s votes!) - this is shaping up to be a really good year ā¤ļø

16 hours ago, DaTilt said:

However, I also want to be fair to the songs included and want to listen to each song again before giving my ranking (ideally with a second listen for finetuning). With over 100 songs in the list this is quite challenging given that I also curate my own charts each week incl. extensive NMF listening (which blocks 2 days alone) + several other contests ongoing here. I don't feel that comfortable giving my ranking in such hurry, particularly for years I am not that familiar with it.

Saying you want to be fair to the songs like they have feelings. It needs to be the organisers of this event more than it needs to be ā€œfair to the songsā€œ.

If you don’t feel ā€œcomfortableā€ giving a ranking then simply don’t. If you want to host one for the 90’s and have it take over half a year of work and tallying scores etc so that you can be fair to the songs then you do that but don’t put that expectation onto others.

19 hours ago, ElectroBoy said:

Yeah it is a lot of work, especially for 1. I did help out for about 3-4 years before last year. But I had various things going on which meant I couldn't really commit (in fact looking back I;'m surprised I did it in 2024... but I may have bailed when it came to then semis/ final write ups). Am back this year... I had actually forgotten how messy the noms thread was and how long the count up takes 🤣

Iz used to run it solo, for many, many years though.... Christ knows how 🤣

It is very much appreciated the hard work the posters who host Record of the Decade.

5 minutes ago, Mack. said:

It is very much appreciated the hard work the posters who host Record of the Decade.

Facts.

I’ve been on BJ since the start and I’ve always been mostly a viewer in the background but I always take part in record of the decade, I love it and am grateful for those putting it together.

1 hour ago, Viper* said:

Saying you want to be fair to the songs like they have feelings. It needs to be the organisers of this event more than it needs to be ā€œfair to the songsā€œ.

If you don’t feel ā€œcomfortableā€ giving a ranking then simply don’t. If you want to host one for the 90’s and have it take over half a year of work and tallying scores etc so that you can be fair to the songs then you do that but don’t put that expectation onto others.

Well, the work will be the same independently whether you give one or two weeks time for reactions. And I have written in the same post, which you not fully cited, that I appreciate the work of the organisers. I do the multichart once a month and know how much time it takes to compile something like this.

And I did not put any expectations on others - it was just a suggestion and I am free to put those whenever I want.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.