Posted January 20, 20196 yr 1. They tell us how to behave, while ignoring moral standards themselves. any more?
January 20, 20196 yr Refuse to answer a reporter's question and instead comment on something to do with the topic that doesn't answer the question. Edited January 20, 20196 yr by The Snake
January 21, 20196 yr Author Refuse to answer a reporter's question and instead comment on something to do with the topic that doesn't answer the question. That's a good one.
January 24, 20196 yr When watching Parliament, they always seem to be making noises when a speaker is speaking. Especially when the chamber is packed and during Prime Minister’s Questions. I suspect it is not only the public that has to resort to Hansard’s!
February 14, 20196 yr Author I have another one - they'd rather turn a blind eye to abuse (Rochdale, Rotherham etc.), than risk being called 'racist'. :puke:
February 14, 20196 yr I have another one - they'd rather turn a blind eye to abuse (Rochdale, Rotherham etc.), than risk being called 'racist'. :puke: hmmm more the police than politicians. It's not unique to politicians either - turning a blind eye to any sort of abuse is human nature to a very large extent: gas chambers, Saville, phone hacking, the list is endless and goes back as far as humans do. Not everyone turns a blind eye, thankfully, and I'm not excusing politicians who do turn a blind eye - I'm quick to slag them off because it's their job not to, and to make sure systems are in place to stop it - but I would say "how many people would get involved to stop a homeless person being beaten up? Or ring the police?" and I suspect the answer would be "most wouldn't".
Create an account or sign in to comment