The whole Brexit project is people with no interests getting a hobby and get-together. That's why it has support. It's like a social club like the womens institute or a golf club, with no entry or signup fee.

The whole Brexit project is people with no interests getting a hobby and get-together. That's why it has support. It's like a social club like the womens institute or a golf club, with no entry or signup fee.

 

This.

 

I bet if there was an option to unilaterally rescind EU citizenship, this lot wouldn't put their money where their mouths are.

I don't know how no deal will be because I don't have a crystal ball. No-one knows. It's like booking a hotel for a holiday, despite reviews you don't really know for certain what it'll be like until you get there. Of course getting an agreed deal is better but if we can't we still have to leave as it was the will of the people and that shouldn't be ignored.

 

You fail to see that it is going to be terrible. I can assure you this, as I have said many times before I work for a large business. I know the complexities faced for us as an organisation. There is no space for stockpiling. Anything we import will have to go through manual, labourorous administration. It's basic economics. It's a shite idea.

 

Everyone loses with Brexit, people just don't see it. Only people who gain are the 1%.

You obviously haven't read the whole thread. I have given two good reasons. Less immigration from the EU which will lessen the strain on our housing, benefits and health services and we save all the money we pay in to the EU.

 

I work and have experience in the social housing sector and can tell you the reality that European nationals can go on the waiting list for council housing but are only eligible if they have 'working status'. If they don't they are ineligible. So how does that put a strain on that sector?

I work and have experience in the social housing sector and can tell you the reality that European nationals can go on the waiting list for council housing but are only eligible if they have 'working status'. If they don't they are ineligible. So how does that put a strain on that sector?

 

Just one of those lame excuses. If anything EU nationals boom the private sector as not many of them can afford to buy, so it means there is a huge renting sector. Like I say all these self made millionaires who want Brexit cos they made their money through property is like turkeys voting for Christmas. No-one has any ideas about anything apart from what they read in the Daily Mail or some nugget like Nigel Farage spouts out.

Andrea Leadsom has tonight said on ITV's Peston that she understand that Boris intends to send two letters to the EU. One will ask for an extension as he's required to do by law and the other will ask them not to give us one.

LMAO!!! :rofl: What a plonker!

Pathetic, and even more pathetic is the British media for consistently failing to report on how bonkers and out of the ordinary any of this is.

 

Boris Johnson needs Supernanny.

Well the guy's only trying to keep his promise to get us out by 31st. Promises are meant to be kept aren't they?

Edited October 9, 20195 yr by Common Sense

And there was me thinking that Boris Johnson might try to initiate a modern day version of "The Rhodesia Solution".

 

For anyone who doesn't know what I'm on about, let me indulge myself by posting this pertinent clip from "Yes Minister" (a different one this time). It would not have surprised me if he tried to get around needing to ask for a deadline by doing something similar:

 

Well the guy's only trying to keep his promise to get us out by 31st. Promises are meant to be kept aren't they?

 

I remember when he promised he'd lie down in front of bulldozers at Heathrow Airport.

 

Unfortunately he didn't keep that one.

This is just that all over again. Those two letters thing is just absolutely pathrtic. When the EU demands a 1 year extension, he will run back shouting, look look! Look at my letter and its outrageous Brexshitty narional embarrassment language! I'm on your side! I twieeed :(

You obviously haven't read the whole thread. I have given two good reasons. Less immigration from the EU which will lessen the strain on our housing, benefits and health services and we save all the money we pay in to the EU.

 

You've already been TOLD that immigration will not go down. Down from EU perhaps but not down in total as people will still be needed from somewhere(ie. India, Turkey..) so the strain on housing will NOT be lessened.

 

DEFEND your points like a bloody man and stop SLITHERING away and IGNORING points when contfronted with the truth which doesn't fit in with your racist(yes I know where your wife is from, but that doesn't automatically mean you can't be racist so quit playing that old card) blinkered outlook on life and maybe you'll be taken more seriously.

 

You've already been TOLD that immigration will not go down. Down from EU perhaps but not down in total as people will still be needed from somewhere(ie. India, Turkey..) so the strain on housing will NOT be lessened.

 

But we *won't* be stopping immigration from the EU, even in a No Deal scenario, that's something Remainers like to gloss over - we just will no longer be required to accept every Tom, Dick & Harry with minimal checks.

 

But we *won't* be stopping immigration from the EU, even in a No Deal scenario, that's something Remainers like to gloss over - we just will no longer be required to accept every Tom, Dick & Harry with minimal checks.

 

 

Yes. At least there'd be some checks on them as there are for people from other countries.

Andrea Leadsom has tonight said on ITV's Peston that she understand that Boris intends to send two letters to the EU. One will ask for an extension as he's required to do by law and the other will ask them not to give us one.

I don’t suppose Leadsom was asked what impact that might have on the country’s trustworthiness in future negotiations on trade and other matters.

Yes. At least there'd be some checks on them as there are for people from other countries.

Such as what? There are checks now and, as you have been told countless times, they can be removed from the country if they fail to find work or other means of supporting themselves. Those rules were introduced because the UK insisted on it.

Such as what? There are checks now and, as you have been told countless times, they can be removed from the country if they fail to find work or other means of supporting themselves. Those rules were introduced because the UK insisted on it.

 

 

They can be removed if you can find them!

But we *won't* be stopping immigration from the EU, even in a No Deal scenario, that's something Remainers like to gloss over - we just will no longer be required to accept every Tom, Dick & Harry with minimal checks.

Any failure to check arrivals is a failure on the part of the British government to enact the provisions of EU law

 

As you’ve already been told COUNTLESS TIMES

They can be removed if you can find them!

 

And with a lesser volume, post Brexit, it'd be easier to keep track...