While trying to formulate a response to the troll that didn’t, directly, insult him it appears that three of us have come to the same conclusion on what the EU should do. I really believe that’s the smart play

Extension until ratification of the deal by all parties is what the EU should offer. No ticking clock. It removes the possibility of a no deal cliff that would be damaging to all and then allows departure on date of UK ratification. Also allows for a ratification via a People’s Vote on our side without needing to request a further extension. Win wins all round really

 

 

:banghead: We don't need a People's Vote. WE'VE HAD ONE. Why can't you remainers accept the result? More people voted leave than remain. Sometimes I think I'm debating with 4 year-lds here.Why not just accept it. If remain had one I wouldn't have been happy but would have accepted a democratic result. Boris doesn't want a second referendum and it's not thought there's a majority in Parliament for one either.

Edited October 19, 20195 yr by Freddie Kruger

Of course the EU will keep granting extensions as they don't want us to leave because we put so much money in. They're frustrating Brexit just like remainers. Oh for one of the 27 to say enough's enough and have the balls to say no. I know it won't happen though as they're all cowards. Merkel's already said that when we leave Germany doesn't want to pay as much.

Edited October 19, 20195 yr by Freddie Kruger

:banghead: We don't need a People's Vote. WE'VE HAD ONE. Why can't you remainers accept the result? More people voted leave than remain. Sometimes I think I'm debating with 4 year-lds here.Why not just accept it. If remain had one I wouldn't have been happy but would have accepted a democratic result. Boris doesn't want a second referendum and it's not thought there's a majority in Parliament for one either.

We've told you dozens of times. First, the referendum was advisory. Second, it was on a vague, undefined concept. A second vote would be on an actual agreement. Third, the agreement bears no resemblance whatsoever to anything the Leave campaign called for. Which of those points can you still not understand?

We’re the only ones providing reasoned logical arguments but go off hun

We've told you dozens of times. First, the referendum was advisory. Second, it was on a vague, undefined concept. A second vote would be on an actual agreement. Third, the agreement bears no resemblance whatsoever to anything the Leave campaign called for. Which of those points can you still not understand?

 

 

It wasn't vague at all. What's vague about the question that was put before us? "Should we leave the EU or remain?"

The EU really are pathetic. They know that Boris, the UK PM, doesn't want an extension so why don't they take that in to account and the fact that he's been forced to send a request for one and not grant us an extension.

 

 

Bit like a kid sending a birthday party invitation but telling the other kid in the playground. "I don't really want you but my parents said I had to invite you" Would you go?

Edited October 19, 20195 yr by Freddie Kruger

The EU really are pathetic. They know that Boris, the UK PM, doesn't want an extension so why don't they take that in to account and the fact that he's been forced to send a request for one and not grant us an extension.

Bit like a kid sending a birthday party invitation but telling the other kid in the playground. "I don't really want you but my parents said I had to invite you" Would you go?

Time to put the cider down and go to bed

My lord. He gets dumber by the post.

It wasn't vague at all. What's vague about the question that was put before us? "Should we leave the EU or remain?"

 

SERIOUSLY?

 

Most people have no idea how the EU works or how it impacts our lives, both negatively and positively.

 

Johnson and his government are the patheic ones here, and trust me, YOU are the one acting like a four year old. You have NO IDEA how the world works . You treat the most serious post ww2 event this country has seen like a football game or BGT final, sitting at home, pissing tax payers money away and passing judgment on everybody!

 

Still you do this in full acknowledgement that it will piss people off because you are a troll.

Edited October 20, 20195 yr by mald487

SERIOUSLY?

 

Most people have no idea how the EU works or how it impacts our lives, both negatively and positively.

 

That was what the referendum campaign was about.

 

To listen to Remainers now, you'd think they'd been banned from all promotion during the campaign... :rolleyes:

 

Most people have no idea how the EU works or how it impacts our lives, both negatively and positively.

 

 

There you've said it. If it affects our lives NEGATIVELY at all then we shouldn't be in it despite the positives.

Edited October 20, 20195 yr by Freddie Kruger

There you've said it. If it affects our lives NEGATIVELY at all then we shouldn't be in it despite the positives.

Better get rid f governments then. After all, they also affect our lives negatively. While we’re at it, let’s abolish weather too.

Better get rid f governments then. After all, they also affect our lives negatively. While we’re at it, let’s abolish weather too.

 

LOL!

 

Leave the nonsense to Queef... :rolleyes:

There you've said it. If it affects our lives NEGATIVELY at all then we shouldn't be in it despite the positives.

 

You're affecting my life negatively right now but I haven’t asked you to leave.

Edited October 20, 20195 yr by T Boy

There you've said it. If it affects our lives NEGATIVELY at all then we shouldn't be in it despite the positives.

 

Ah! So your logic is we shouldn't do something if there are some downsides. Then surely we shouldn't leave then?

 

As it has been extensively demonstrated that leaving will impact our lives for the MOST PART negatively, and most people will be worse off OUT of the EU than they are IN!

 

So by using your logic I can conclude you would concede that leaving is a mistake.

 

Of course, you're not saying that are you? You're just contradicting yourself yet again for the 1,232,294th time. :)

Edited October 20, 20195 yr by mald487

Ah! So your logic is we shouldn't do something if there are some downsides. Then surely we shouldn't leave then?

 

As it has been extensively demonstrated that leaving will impact our lives for the MOST PART negatively, and most people will be worse off OUT of the EU than they are IN!

 

This has not be demonstrated, only *suggested* by Project Fear.

 

Some Labour 'Brexit deliverers' have crossed the Rubicon now.

 

@1185663650788450304

 

Arguing about delivering the result, their constituents' wishes and their electoral fortunes is one thing, but for centrist MPs to use anti-Euro/Troika arguments used by the radical left in Greece and Portugal in order to justify voting for a Boris Johnson Brexit is painful. Both Caroline Flint and Melanie Onn are anti-Corbyn Blairites, and why would they have campaigned for Remain if they believed this, or that the 'EU is responsible for the rise in zero-hours contracts and privatisation' all along? It's so dishonest.

 

These MPs are lauding Boris Johnson supposedly committing to keeping UK workers' rights to the same standards as the EU and basing their vote off this, but according to them, the EU's standards are terrible.

The majority of these Labour Brexit deliverers are based around me, in the North Midlands and Yorkshire, as the Brexit vote was very strong here. I live in a Tory-Labour marginal but I'll in effect spoil my vote and go for a no-hoper Green/Lib Dem in the next election (4.5% between them last time) if my Labour candidate is like this.

This has not be demonstrated, only *suggested* by Project Fear.

No, the governments own assessments say this. Why is a government going ahead with something when their own assessments say it will damage the economy?