It's not about "winning" or "losing", this isn't an episode of X Factor.

 

Stop being so bloody childish. You're what, 65?

 

:angry: How rude. I'll be 60 in January and look nowhere near my age. :D

 

 

Of course it's about winning or losing. All the parties refer to winning the election or winning a majority. No one likes a loser.

Edited November 25, 20195 yr by common sense

:angry: How rude. I'll be 60 in January and look nowhere near my age. :D

Of course it's about winning or losing. All the parties refer to winning the election or winning a majority. No one likes a loser.

 

You’d know, I guess.

 

Jokes aside, people don’t dislike someone just because they didn’t win something. They dislike them because they’re either utterly horrific as people or they will stop you getting what you want.

If you care about winning or losing, go watch X Factor. Leave politics to the young who care about FIXING THE COUNTRY, not bragging about "winning" on a few internet forums.

:angry: How rude. I'll be 60 in January and look nowhere near my age. :D

Of course it's about winning or losing. All the parties refer to winning the election or winning a majority. No one likes a loser.

 

 

The parties may "win" or "lose" but this isn´t one big game. A vote for Tory means years more austerity and hardship for many.

 

I have friends and family(degree educated) who are working harder than ever but are getting POORER. This wasn´t happening to them under Labour.

 

Of course this is an alien concept to you because you´ve NEVER had to lift a finger on your ADULT life. So forgive us if we take issue when you start to spout nonsense about how people shouldn´t be so greedy and should be happy with their lot when you literally get money for doing SWEET F.A.

 

Maybe if you had to actually get off the sofa and go and earn your crust for the pittance that many people get in return, then you would have a different view.

Edited November 25, 20195 yr by mald487

If you can about winning or losing, go watch X Factor. Leave politics to the young who care about FIXING THE COUNTRY, not bragging about "winning" on a few internet forums.

 

 

Except us oldies have been around a bit longer, have more life experience and may know what's best for the country.

Except us oldies have been around a bit longer, have more life experience and may know what's best for the country.

 

Being older doesn’t mean you know any better. Having experience can mean anything and everyone’s experience is different.

 

I hate being in that in between age where I’m no longer ‘young’ but I still get condescended to by older people, I would have hoped that would have stopped by now.

Except us oldies have been around a bit longer, have more life experience and may know what's best for the country.

 

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

Never read such shit in my life

Except us oldies have been around a bit longer, have more life experience and may know what's best for the country.

 

How do YOU know what´s best for the country?? :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

Times change, things move on, work differently.

 

Not wanting to go all Michael here but there are many young creative minds out there, whose ideas and concepts need a chance to be allowed to shine through.

Edited November 25, 20195 yr by mald487

Except us oldies have been around a bit longer, have more life experience and may know what's best for the country.

 

OK boomer.

 

Anyway, you don't even know your arse from a hole in the ground let alone what's best for the country.

Anyway, you don't even know your arse from a hole in the ground let alone what's best for the country.

 

 

You don't even know me. All you know is what you see typed on a screen. For all you lot know I may be a 25 year-old woman.

You don't even know me. All you know is what you see typed on a screen. For all you lot know I may be a 25 year-old woman.

 

I think when you see thousands upon thousands of somebody's posts on an internet forum you get a pretty good insight into how their mind works, regardless of whether you know them or not.

 

But just because you're old doesn't automatically mean some of the things you come out with deserve to be given credence or that you have the wisdom of somebody younger than you.

Edited November 25, 20195 yr by Tawdry Hepburn

@1199697628545650688

 

This is ridiculous. They should have had all leaders confirmed before airing any notoriously difficult Andrew Neil interviews. Another potential breach of impartiality.

 

Corbyn didn't perform well yesterday and he certainly didn't make any new fans. Sturgeon also struggled. I don't particularly enjoy the Neil style of interviewing, he routinely interrupts, but I knew that Johnson would have to deal with the same.

Edited November 27, 20195 yr by blacksquare

I assume the BBC felt they had to go ahead with the earlier Andrew Neil interviews to avoid running out of time. Johnson has already wimped out the seven-way debate on Friday.

My guess is that Boris won't do it which I suppose is his right. They may think he has nothing really to gain and plenty to lose by doing it as Neil can ask some awkward questions as showed with Corbyn. Someone on DS has emailed him daring him to ask Boris about the wrong DWP assessments and why so many appeals succeed.

Edited November 27, 20195 yr by common sense

I assume the BBC felt they had to go ahead with the earlier Andrew Neil interviews to avoid running out of time. Johnson has already wimped out the seven-way debate on Friday.

 

@1199722617156100097

 

It'll be interesting to see what happens here.

My guess is that Boris won't do it which I suppose is his right. They may think he has nothing really to gain and plenty to lose by doing it as Neil can ask some awkward questions as showed with Corbyn. Someone on DS has emailed him daring him to ask Boris about the wrong DWP assessments and why so many appeals succeed.

 

 

 

"Daring?" As if that's a naughty question to ask?? Those are the types of questions he SHOULD be being asked. He's Prime Minister FFS!

"Daring?" As if that's a naughty question to ask?? Those are the types of questions he SHOULD be being asked. He's Prime Minister FFS!

 

 

Yes I know he should be asking that. Why millions of taxpayers money are being wasted on appeals which wouldn't be needed if the correct decision had been made in the first place.

Edited November 27, 20195 yr by common sense

My guess is that Boris won't do it which I suppose is his right. They may think he has nothing really to gain and plenty to lose by doing it as Neil can ask some awkward questions as showed with Corbyn. Someone on DS has emailed him daring him to ask Boris about the wrong DWP assessments and why so many appeals succeed.

Don't you think answering difficult questions should be considered part of the job of being PM?

Don't you think answering difficult questions should be considered part of the job of being PM?

 

 

Yes of course I do and would like him to ask that myself and see how he answers it.