Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 724
  • Views 44.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Jealous was so average tho. I thought people only liked it because they wanted to suck his d :unsure:
Jealous was so average tho. I thought people only liked it because they wanted to suck his d :unsure:

:D

What was wrong with 1993? :unsure:

 

And besides Lay Me Down, no,1s have been ok this year.

Edited by T Boy

It's 1993 all over again so far in this years chart

Do you mean 1992 when there were few chart toppers? Explain!

EVERYTHING.

 

It's probably when Jenny Fisher was born and she ruined the Now series with her a Rihanna hate tbh.

Do you mean 1992 when there were few chart toppers? Explain!

1992 had no one-week #1s and 1993 only had one one-week #1

1992 had no one-week #1s and 1993 only had one one-week #1

 

Good!

1 week #1's are fine as long as there are interesting battles each week. Last year was very predictable for that period where there was only ever one contender each week (although I did like the majority of those tracks). Long-runners are good too in that it's unpredictable who/what comes along & when they get overthrown.
Good!

Although the longest period they went without a one-week #1 was two years between November 1991 and November 1993

I don't know what BuzzJack has against 1 week #1s really. I find constant long runners more boring by comparison! I like a mix of both.
I don't know what BuzzJack has against 1 week #1s really. I find constant long runners more boring by comparison! I like a mix of both.

 

The problem is less with the one weekers themselves and more with the posters that gave huge sticks up their arses that moan every time we have a long runner as if it's crushing their souls because the county isn't following a nice symmetrical one week pattern that's pleasing to their eyes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.