Hoping that Slide Away doesn’t get starred out and poor Tinashe still being kept out of the top 5 but at least she’s overtaken Calvin

'Manchild' looks certain to be heading to ACR, with 'Dior' and 'Blessings' going too unless there's been a sizeable drop in the market.

Very happy to see Chappell starting to look very safe for her 2nd number 1.

Where is Ordinary ? Still #11 ?

Slide Away?? Please stay on the chart!

Much as I love Slide Away, it’s a bit depressing that we might have just two new entries with one of them being over 39 years old.

3 minutes ago, Suedehead2 said:

Much as I love Slide Away, it’s a bit depressing that we might have just two new entries with one of them being over 39 years old.

1994 wasn't quite that long ago!

It’s a shame it’s not Miley’s ‘Slide Away’ that’s charting!

13 minutes ago, Tafty said:

It’s a shame it’s not Miley’s ‘Slide Away’ that’s charting!

Said this other day its the far superior slide away 🤣

58 minutes ago, jimwatts said:

1994 wasn't quite that long ago!

Oops, that should have been 30! Just for clarification, I don’t mean 30 factorial which is a very big number.

I just hope beautiful thing dies slow painfully on acr never see light of day or scr agin

55 minutes ago, Suedehead2 said:

Oops, that should have been 30! Just for clarification, I don’t mean 30 factorial which is a very big number.

No cheating, what is 30 factorial (i know what factorial means so not after a definition 🤣)

2 hours ago, jimwatts said:

'Manchild' looks certain to be heading to ACR, with 'Dior' and 'Blessings' going too unless there's been a sizeable drop in the market.

3 examples of ACR working exactly as it's supposed to!

Why can't this happen more often?

Wow just realised slide Away is in!!

One of the early days gems From

oasis!

11 hours ago, 777666jason said:

No cheating, what is 30 factorial (i know what factorial means so not after a definition 🤣)

I could have worked it out but it would have taken too long. It is approximately 2.7*10^32. For a sense of just how big that number is, here are some significantly smaller numbers -

Number of drops of water in the Pacific Ocean - 10^25

Age of the universe in seconds - 4*10^17

Number of grains of sand to fill the Grand Canyon - 4*10^19

15 minutes ago, Suedehead2 said:

I could have worked it out but it would have taken too long. It is approximately 2.7*10^32. For a sense of just how big that number is, here are some significantly smaller numbers -

Number of drops of water in the Pacific Ocean - 10^25

Age of the universe in seconds - 4*10^17

Number of grains of sand to fill the Grand Canyon - 4*10^19

Yeah, factorials result in some impressively big numbers. My favourite fact, which I read somewhere on Buzzjack I think, is that there are more ways to shuffle a deck of cards (52 factorial or 8x10^67) than there are atoms on Earth this means that every time you shuffle a deck of cards, it's highly likely that no other deck of cards in history has ever been shuffled in the exact same order before!

But maybe we should get back to the chart predictions now

Edited 18 hours ago18 hr by Mangø

22 minutes ago, Suedehead2 said:

I could have worked it out but it would have taken too long. It is approximately 2.7*10^32. For a sense of just how big that number is, here are some significantly smaller numbers -

Number of drops of water in the Pacific Ocean - 10^25

Age of the universe in seconds - 4*10^17

Number of grains of sand to fill the Grand Canyon - 4*10^19

Oh I know i was just curious if you would work it out 😅

13 hours ago, Suedehead2 said:

Oops, that should have been 30! Just for clarification, I don’t mean 30 factorial which is a very big number.

It’s the kind of thing I’d try to work out in order to help me get to sleep at night 😴

1 hour ago, Suedehead2 said:

Age of the universe in seconds - 4*10^17

and 'Beautiful Things' has been Top 40 for 4.5*10^7 of them

2 hours ago, jimwatts said:

and 'Beautiful Things' has been Top 40 for 4.5*10^7 of them

Feels like longer 😅