Jump to content

Featured Replies

This Digital Spy poster is spot on. Agree totally with this.

 

 

"This needs to be completed once and for all.

 

If there is going to be a vote on October 19th, it should simply be to leave on the terms of any deal or leave without. Either way, the UK must leave by October 31st at the very latest. If we can leave any sooner then all the better.

 

Revoking article 50 should never be an option. We are so close to realising the benefits of leaving, it needs to be delivered.

 

All of the scaremongering needs to stop and the UK must be freed to allow us all to move forward and prosper from this opportunity.

 

We will be leaving at the end of the month."

  • Replies 2k
  • Views 59.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There is no way this is completed at the end of the month. No possible way. The only options that end it any bloody time soon are Revoke and Remain winning via a second referendum.

 

Any leaving is merely the end of the goddamn beginning and you know it.

Yep. Nothing about leaving without a deal means Brexit is done, or completed, or finalised, or any of the other bullshit that's floated around. It's absolute madness that it's even something people are actually considering, and that is what should never be an option.
  • Author
Revoking article 50 should never be an option. We are so close to realising the benefits of leaving, it needs to be delivered.

 

All of the scaremongering needs to stop and the UK must be freed to allow us all to move forward and prosper from this opportunity.

 

Can you please explain these benefits of leaving without a deal? In what ways are we going to prosper?

 

Yep. Nothing about leaving without a deal means Brexit is done, or completed, or finalised, or any of the other bullshit that's floated around. It's absolute madness that it's even something people are actually considering, and that is what should never be an option.

 

Exactly.

This Digital Spy poster is spot on. Agree totally with this.

"This needs to be completed once and for all.

 

If there is going to be a vote on October 19th, it should simply be to leave on the terms of any deal or leave without. Either way, the UK must leave by October 31st at the very latest. If we can leave any sooner then all the better.

 

Revoking article 50 should never be an option. We are so close to realising the benefits of leaving, it needs to be delivered.

 

All of the scaremongering needs to stop and the UK must be freed to allow us all to move forward and prosper from this opportunity.

 

We will be leaving at the end of the month."

 

The person who wrotr that is brainwashed beyond beleif. Sorry. That is the biggest laod of shite I HAVE EVER SEEN!!

 

LET US f***ING REPEAT FOR THE 100TH TIME COMMON SENSE:

 

1. NON BINDING

2. 50 50 SPLIT

3. 2 NATION SPLIT

4. NO YOUTH SUPPORT

5. LEAVE AND TORJES LIED. IT HAS NO MANDATE

 

 

 

If it is thr f***ing WERRL ERFF PERPERRRRRL, THEN PUT IT AGAINST REMAIN IN A VOTE VS A SENSIBLE SOFR BREXSHIT DEAL THAT LEAVE CAMPAIGNED FOR. GAWW.
Someone on DS, a remainer, reckons he's worried as he's suddenly himself thought of how Boris could circumvent the Benn act. What if he goes to the EU summit next Thursday, 17th (remember he was to send extension letter by 19th) and at the end of it says that talks appear to have broken down, if they appear to have, and we're leaving at midnight that day, 17th or next day.. Could anyone stop that? He wouldn't have broken the law as he wouldn't need to send the letter and we'd crash out. Do you have to wait until the final extension date though to leave or can you leave earlier?

There'll be no circumvention of the Benn act when we know now that Johnson is perfectly happy with extending, as he has successfully set up the 'betrayal' narrative and remaining Brexit Party support is very soft.

“Can realise the benefits of leaving”

 

Since Cameron got back in power in 2015 and this timeline started hurtling towards hell, I’m yet to actually hear any benefits from leaving that weren’t either wholly fictional or dwarfed by the corresponding benefit of staying

1. NON BINDING

2. 50 50 SPLIT

3. 2 NATION SPLIT

4. NO YOUTH SUPPORT

5. LEAVE AND TORJES LIED. IT HAS NO MANDATE

 

 

You're like stuck LP record. :rolleyes:

  • Author
“Can realise the benefits of leaving”

 

Since Cameron got back in power in 2015 and this timeline started hurtling towards hell, I’m yet to actually hear any benefits from leaving that weren’t either wholly fictional or dwarfed by the corresponding benefit of staying

 

Good luck with that — both on here and elsewhere.

Speaker John Bercow faced allegations of 'plotting' today after it emerged he met the EU parliament chief to discuss their 'shared' desire to avoid No Deal.

 

David Sassoli revealed he held talks with Mr Bercow in London this morning, telling MEPs they were on the 'same wavelength'.

 

Mr Sassoli said the pair agreed that the UK and EU Parliaments must have a key role in 'managing' the Brexit process.

 

'We share an awareness that a chaotic exit of the UK from the EU would work to the detriment of citizens on both sides,' he said.

 

But the news sparked anger from Eurosceptics including Nigel Farage, who said it was a 'disgrace' that the president and the Speaker had 'agreed to work to prevent a clean break Brexit'.

 

'What right does the Speaker have to do this?' he demanded.

 

And Tory Brexiteer Marcus Fysh added: ‘How disgraceful for the Speaker to be colluding with a foreign power, if that indeed has happened.

 

‘That is so far beyond his constitutional role, it is truly disgusting, and clearly brings the House of Commons into disrepute, which is contempt of the House of Commons.’

 

The warm words for Mr Bercow from Mr Sassoli contrasted with his description of his meeting with Boris Johnson in No10 last night.

 

 

As far as I was aware the Speaker should be neutral and shouldn't be interfering like this. Thank goodness the odious little man is retiring.
As far as I was aware the Speaker should be neutral and shouldn't be interfering like this. Thank goodness the odious little man is retiring.

 

Im fairly sure Boris will cling on for as long as he can though? :unsure:

Chris no-one can take you seriously when people call you out and you cannot provide an answer. It's fine to call people "fear mongoers" but I'd say these people also live in cloud cuckoo-land. You've not given us a single benefit of leaving the EU and you don't seem to be able to grasp the concept that even if we leave on the 31st October this ends Brexit. If anything, leaving without No Deal just prolongs the suffering of Brexit as it will be in the news for the next 20 years while we thrash out trade deals.
Chris no-one can take you seriously when people call you out and you cannot provide an answer. It's fine to call people "fear mongoers" but I'd say these people also live in cloud cuckoo-land. You've not given us a single benefit of leaving the EU and you don't seem to be able to grasp the concept that even if we leave on the 31st October this ends Brexit. If anything, leaving without No Deal just prolongs the suffering of Brexit as it will be in the news for the next 20 years while we thrash out trade deals.

 

 

You obviously haven't read the whole thread. I have given two good reasons. Less immigration from the EU which will lessen the strain on our housing, benefits and health services and we save all the money we pay in to the EU.

1. No money is saved. Sorry. Money is lost - and massively - by leaving the EU. Oops.

 

2. Immigration will GO UP as Turkey India etc have already DEMANDED it in return for trade deals and Lil England will be begging for trade. Sooooooo yeaaah. Neither reason is good. Thank u, next!

You obviously haven't read the whole thread. I have given two good reasons. Less immigration from the EU which will lessen the strain on our housing, benefits and health services and we save all the money we pay in to the EU.

 

I really don’t think those things mean we’ll be better off leaving with no deal. You continue to ignore all the evidence of how bad no deal will be, especially for you. And this is why people think you’re trolling.

I really don’t think those things mean we’ll be better off leaving with no deal. You continue to ignore all the evidence of how bad no deal will be, especially for you. And this is why people think you’re trolling.

 

 

I don't know how no deal will be because I don't have a crystal ball. No-one knows. It's like booking a hotel for a holiday, despite reviews you don't really know for certain what it'll be like until you get there. Of course getting an agreed deal is better but if we can't we still have to leave as it was the will of the people and that shouldn't be ignored.

Edited by Common Sense

I don't know how no deal will be because I don't have a crystal ball. No-one knows. It's like booking a hotel for a holiday, despite reviews you don't really know for certain what it'll be like until you get there. Of course getting an agreed deal is better but if we can't we still have to leave as it was the will of the people and that shouldn't be ignored.

 

But if a hotel has shit reviews, I won’t go there, not even to find out if it’s true. I’d love to be able to do the same with a no deal Brexit but people like you seem hell bent in forcing me to find out just because people voted for it 3 years ago without proper facts. The picture is much clearer now and definitely bleak and I will never understand why you want that for us.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.