August 3, 2024Aug 3 I said it wasn’t JUST directed at the people on here. And I stand by being disgusted by it. You really need to take a look at what you’re defending. A 17 year old boy was co-erced (allegedly etc.) into sending nude pictures to an elderly man. I just can’t get over this being deemed acceptable by anyone. Thanks for saying that, as I am a year older than Huw Edwards, I am “elderly”.
August 3, 2024Aug 3 Thanks for saying that, as I am a year older than Huw Edwards, I am “elderly”. Compared to a 17 year old boy, yes
August 3, 2024Aug 3 They've taken down Doctor Who's crsppy crappy Fear Her episode, due to a Huw Edwards cameo in it!!!
August 3, 2024Aug 3 Oh,so you weren't JUST casting aspersions on us. That's alrighty then. Equal opportunities aspersions only /s I’m not going to apologise for having an opinion. Not just about Huw Edwards, but to attempt to call me out for my “inflammatory comments” about Phillip Schofield is pretty unbelievable! I’m not going to apologise for having a negative opinion about men accused of doing horrible things to children
August 3, 2024Aug 3 And the person in question claims that that wasn't actually the case. Why would you do that when you could sue for damages? If he changes his tune or something comes out that changes the story then I will hold my hands up. Until that point we have parents that seem to be estranged from an adult son claiming that their adult son was child abused, which their adult son denies ever happened and denies that he was working in the adult industry until he was an adult anyway so it functionally could not have happened. Why haven't we seen a birth certificate to clear the whole thing up? For context, I was raised in a very homophobic background where any number of parents that thought they had a gay child would pull any kind of tricks like this to try and demonstrate to their kid that being gay led to punishment. The victim deciding not to press charges does not mean no crime has taken place. Children cannot consent. And as for the highlighted part, that has literally no relevance to this case. Just nonsense.
August 3, 2024Aug 3 I’m not going to apologise for having an opinion. Not just about Huw Edwards, but to attempt to call me out for my “inflammatory comments” about Phillip Schofield is pretty unbelievable! I’m not going to apologise for having a negative opinion about men accused of doing horrible things to children For the record, I’ve not once asked you to apologise for anything. I’m giving my opinion on the way you’re posting and trying to advise you on how to not get into trouble by saying things before all of the information has come to light.
August 3, 2024Aug 3 For the record, I’ve not once asked you to apologise for anything. I’m giving my opinion on the way you’re posting and trying to advise you on how to not get into trouble by saying things before all of the information has come to light. That part was in reply to J00prstar. And I highly doubt Huw Edwards or Phillip Schofield or their lawyers are ever going to see my posts on this forum.
August 3, 2024Aug 3 And as for the highlighted part, that has literally no relevance to this case. Just nonsense. I'm giving you context because I'm being nice and up until this point I've let you dance around it, but since you keep on keeping on, tough luck. Are you, or are you not, implying that Toby and I are pedophiles? Because you keep coming very close to the edge of hinting that and then going 'oh, it wasnt JUST you that I meant'.
August 3, 2024Aug 3 I'm giving you context because I'm being nice and up until this point I've let you dance around it, but since you keep on keeping on, tough luck. Are you, or are you not, implying that Toby and I are pedophiles? Because you keep coming very close to the edge of hinting that and then going 'oh, it wasnt JUST you that I meant'. I think you are or were defending one and that’s what I’m unhappy about. No need to put words in my mouth
August 3, 2024Aug 3 I think you are or were defending one and that’s what I’m unhappy about. No need to put words in my mouth I’d ask that you don’t put words into ours in that case. Not once in this thread has ANYONE defended a pedophile. Stop implying that they are.
August 3, 2024Aug 3 I think you are or were defending one and that’s what I’m unhappy about. No need to put words in my mouth Sorry to call a spade a spade but I have to ask the question when someone is going around hinting and implying horrible things. I'm still on the fence about this to be honest. It's a bit much for you to retroactively call me defending a paeophile based on comments I made a year ago when Huw hadn't yet actually been accused feasibly of anything to do with minors. Which is, for what it's worth, the root of our disagreement here. You are wholeheartedly sticking with the claim that Huw Edwards did something with a 17 year old, but that claim has already been retracted. "On 7 July 2023, The Sun reported that a well-known BBC presenter had paid a teenager more than £35,000 since they were 17 years old in return for "sordid images". The story was based on allegations by the mother and stepfather of the teenager. A lawyer representing the young person said nothing inappropriate or illegal had taken place, and that they were estranged from their mother." via wikipedia Seedy? Yes. A huge age gap? Yes. In context, now that we know that Edwards liked young lads? Definitely borderline, especially if the content was takinga youthful style. But NOT, in fact, illegal, if the lawyer says that nothing illegal took place, because a minor cannot do anything relating to photography or adult work, ergo, IN THAT CASE, the claims of paying an underage teenager are exaggerated or falsified or made up whole cloth. And until we knew more about Edwards' proclivities, that was all the information we had; that the Sun had made a claim based on what estranged parents alleged was an illegal act, that was then proven by a lawyer to not actually be illegal.
August 3, 2024Aug 3 why is this 'discussion' even being allowed to go around in as many circles as it is lmao?
August 3, 2024Aug 3 why is this 'discussion' even being allowed to go around in as many circles as it is lmao? I don't appreciate someone casting aspersions on me and I wanted to clarify that that was actually happening here.
September 8, 2024Sep 8 2 years today (8th September) he announced the sad news of Her Majesty's death...at lot changed since.
September 16, 2024Sep 16 Edwards wrote “yes xxx” when he was asked by Williams if he wanted sexual images of a person whose “age could be discerned as being between 14 and 16
September 16, 2024Sep 16 Huw Edwards is sentenced to six months' imprisonment, suspended for two years. Chief magistrate Paul Goldspring says his crimes are "extremely serious offences" but Edwards doesn't present a risk or danger to children. The sentence includes a sex offender treatment programme and 25 rehabilitation sessions.
September 16, 2024Sep 16 One inciting post on social media gets you 2 years in jail! Accessing indecent images of children gets you a suspended sentence!
Create an account or sign in to comment