Jump to content

Featured Replies

Impressed with the Amy Macdonald sales. Didn’t realise she had a sizeable loyal fanbase.

  • Replies 138
  • Views 8.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • JosephBoone
    JosephBoone

    "1tro" and "cliff" are both being added to the swear filter x

  • Including all the streams feels like stat padding for the sake of it. It's a decent system as is, GH stuff is interesting to track in its own right but I largely just don't categorise it the same way

  • Neither did poor Dior which dropped so hard to Number 1.

Posted Images

Can we talk about the firepower of that top 5 in the singles? If you were to random generate a date from any time in the last 18 years, theres a better than 1 in 6 chance that the #1 that day was a song by Ed Sheeran, Calvin Harris, Justin Bieber, or Sabrina Carpenter.

3 minutes ago, EmailsICantChase said:

Can we talk about the firepower of that top 5 in the singles? If you were to random generate a date from any time in the last 18 years, theres a better than 1 in 6 chance that the #1 that day was a song by Ed Sheeran, Calvin Harris, Justin Bieber, or Sabrina Carpenter.

Out of 26,541 days since the chart's existence...

Ed was number one for 427 days

Calvin was number one for 273 days

Justin was number one for 266 days

Sabrina was number one for 161 days

Total days= 1,027

1,027/26,541= 0.039 (to 3dp)

So just under 4% chance overall

And since this day 18 years ago

1,027/6,576= 0.156 (to 3dp)

So 15.6% chance of any of them being number one (just less than 1 in 6) 😂

(I am rubbish at maths it seems)

Edited by gasman449

4 minutes ago, gasman449 said:

Ed was number one for 427 days

Calvin was number one for 273 days

Justin was number one for 266 days

Sabrina was number one for 161 days

Total days= 1,027

1,027/26,541= 0.039 (to 3dp)

So just under 4% chance overall

And since this day 18 years ago

1,027/6,576= 0.156 (to 3dp)

So 15.6% chance of any of them being number one (just less than 1 in 6) 😂

It's 1,127, not 1,027. 1,127/6576= 0.171

Didn't expect Calvin's sales to be so close to sabrinas, and hopefully thats a good sign sapphire might repeak at least

Mk looking at an easy second week

Just now, EmailsICantChase said:

It's 1,127, not 1,027. 1,127/6576= 0.171

No idea where I went wrong there- thanks! 😂

Slide away could have if they released it on Friday but they wasted a day of streaming and most of the downloads went to last week too

Love how this top 10 is so different than the Billboard Top 10. Feels like the 90s again

thank god for that too cos America are still allowing a bar song and lose control in the top ten (although we’re both stuck with beautiful things but hey ho)

They really like their Morgan Wallen. I don't get it

3 hours ago, gasman449 said:

Ed and Fleetwood Mac are ahead of Sabrina now, no way she's keeping her streak...

If only she'd saved last week's 3k of vinyls for this week, she would have kept her Top 5 run going, and Oasis would have had an unprecedented Top 3 monopoly last week!

Anyone know what brings Gigi Perez into the album chart finally? Nice to see, hope she can at least remain top 100 by Friday.

57 minutes ago, Riser said:

Anyone know what brings Gigi Perez into the album chart finally? Nice to see, hope she can at least remain top 100 by Friday.

Vinyl release

15 hours ago, Jo' said:

Streaming numbers are very poorly accounted for in the UK Top Albums chart. So I’m not surprised that Bieber is debuting around number 5.

The UK really needs to take a page from what Billboard does in the US when it comes to streaming, to better reflect the actual popularity of an album over the week. That would also put an end to all those pointless number ones on the UK Albums Chart — albums that debut at #1 with barely decent physical sales and often disastrous streaming figures. Then the following week, they drop 50 places, or in some cases, fall out of the Top 100 entirely.

Streaming is now the main way people consume music. It only makes sense that it should be given much more weight in the UK Albums Chart rankings.

This would be an absolutely dreadful approach. The US charts basically encourage artists to add more filler tracks to albums to artificially inflate sales.

Given its duration, Taylor Swift's last album would have been #1 here for about 30 weeks triggering a Buzzjack meltdown.

Im not sure how streaming numbers are poorly accounted for , heck half the top albums are greatest hits isn't that basically because of streaming

Even sabrinas longevity is mostly by streaming

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.